Abstract
The study of the complexity of sets encompasses two complementary aims: (1) establishing—usually via explicit construction of algorithms-that sets are feasible, and (2) studying the relative complexity of sets that plausibly might be feasible but are not currently known to be feasible (such as the NP-complete sets and the PSPACE-complete sets). For the study of the complexity of closure properties, a recent flurry of results has established an analog of (1); these papers explicitly demonstrate many closure properties possessed by PP and C
=P (and the proofs implicitly give closure properties of the function class #P). The present paper presents and develops, for function classes such as #P, SpanP, OptP, and MidP, an analog of (2): a general theory of the complexity of closure properties. In particular, we show that subtraction is hard for the closure properties of each of these classes: each is closed under subtraction if and only if it is closed under
every polynomial-time operation. Previously, no property—natural or unnatural—had been known to have this behavior. We also prove other natural operations hard for the closure properties of #P, SpanP, OptP, and MidP, and we explore the relative complexity of operations that seem not to be # P-hard, such as maximum, minimum, decrement, and median. Moreover, for each of #P, SpanP, OptP, and MidP, we give a natural complete characterization—in terms of the collapse of complexity classes—of the conditions under which that class has every feasible closure property.
