Abstract
Abstract Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is expressed in ˜50% of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and has been proposed as a therapeutic target in this disease. However, trials testing EGFR blockade in TNBC failed to show significant clinical benefit. Probable reasons for such results were patient selection based on EGFR expression and the enrollment of heavily pretreated metastatic patients. Our team has conducted two neoadjuvant trials testing the activity of the anti-EGFR antibodies panitumumab (PTB) and cetuximab (CTX) combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced TNBC. Biomarkers predictive of pathological complete response (pCR) were the level of tumor cell EGFR protein expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes' (TILs) profile (PMIDs 24827135, 26649807). The PTB-treated pts had a higher pCR rate (47%) than the CTX-treated pts (24%), but also a twice higher relapse rate, after 5 years of follow-up. Here we report results of genomic and TILs studies, performed in order to reveal possible determinants of recurrences in those trials. Methods: Tumor tissues sampled before and after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) have been analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS) using a targeted exome panel (MSK-IMPACT) of 410 cancer-related genes. Gene expression was evaluated by Affymetrix arrays. TIL density was assessed on pre-NAT samples according to Salgado et al, 2014 (PMID 25214542). The correlation between response, recurrences, genomic and TIL findings was analyzed in a case-by-case fashion. Results: Sixteen tumors that achieved pCR (PTB: 11, CTX: 5) and 23 non-pCR tumors (PTB: 11, CTX: 12) have been analyzed. For 14 non-pCR tumors (PTB: 6, CTX: 8) data have been obtained both from the pre-NAT and the post-NAT sample. Among those tumors, 6 recurred within 2 years after surgery (PTMB: 3, CTX: 3) and assays are on-going on several others that relapsed. Several genomic aberrations that potentially played a causative role in opposing to therapy were identified. We observed multiple mutations in the PI3K pathway in several non-pCR or relapsing pts. Interestingly, in a residual tumor (RT) of a non-pCR patient we found 3 different activating mutations in PIK3CA and one in PTEN. Another example of genomic selection induced by pharmacological pressure is the emergence of a HRAS G12S mutation in a RT after CTX. Additional novel findings include in-frame mutations and deletions in ARID1B and PARP1 amplification in non-pCR pts. Most of the tumors which recurred had ≤10% TILs (9/13) and only 4/13 had ≥30%. Among the tumors with a post-NAT RT but without recurrence, 17/33 had ≤10% TILs and 16/33 ≥30%. No particular link between TIL density and mutation pattern was observed. Conclusions: This is an example of a case-by-case approach where we captured the intrinsic inter-tumor heterogeneity, which is likely responsible for the different responses to EGFR-targeting in TNBC. Genes/pathways candidate of resistance to therapy are currently being validated. Citation Format: Radosevic-Robin N, Cocco E, Privat M, Abrial C, Penault-Llorca F, Scaltriti M. Potential recurrence markers of locally advanced triple negative breast cancer treated by combined neoadjuvant EGFR targeting and chemotherapy, revealed by genomic analyses and assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-29.