Abstract
Biological reference points for fishery management depend on estimates of current stock status relative to unfished biomass (depletion). The ratio of fish density outside to inside a marine reserve, the density ratio, could serve as a proxy for depletion for data-poor management. However, transient dynamics associated with time lags in returning to the unfished state following reserve implementation make that proxy inaccurate on short time scales. We assessed density ratio management rules using an age-structured, spatially explicit model of four US west coast nearshore fishes following reserve implementation, with scenarios encompassing sampling error, recruitment variability, and uncertainty in natural mortality. In deterministic simulations, management incorporating time lags generally resulted in a higher mean and lower variability in biomass over 20 years, but lower mean yield compared to management that did not. However, when stochastic recruitment was included, differences among simulations due to stochasticity were much greater than any difference in performance between management strategies. Nonetheless, in certain cases, accounting for time lags could help avoid unwarranted increases in harvest effort after reserve implementation.
