Abstract
Estimating heritability has been fundamental in understanding the genetic contributions to complex disorders like late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) and provides a rationale for identifying genetic factors associated with disease susceptibility. While numerous studies have established substantial genetic contribution for LOAD, the interpretation of heritability estimates remains challenging. These challenges are further complicated by the binary nature of LOAD status, where estimation and interpretation require additional considerations. Through a systematic review, we identified LOAD heritability estimates from 6 twin studies and 17 genome-wide association studies, all conducted in populations of European ancestry. We demonstrate that these heritability estimates for LOAD vary considerably. The variation reflects not only differences in study design and methodological approaches but also the underlying study population characteristics. Our findings indicate that commonly cited heritability estimates, often treated as universal values, should be interpreted within specific population contexts and methodological frameworks.