Abstract
Men who have sex with men (MSM) with a history of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) are more likely to report crystal methamphetamine use and condomless anal intercourse (CAI) than MSM without CSA. MSM with CSA may benefit less in HIV prevention interventions due to long-term psychological effects. Data are from a pilot randomized, controlled trial testing an integrated HIV risk reduction and behavioral activation counseling intervention vs standard of care among MSM with methamphetamine use disorder, which showed effects at reducing CAI. We conducted a secondary analysis ( N = 38) to preliminarily assess whether CSA moderated the intervention effects on the two primary outcomes: CAI acts with men whose HIV serostatus was either positive or unknown (1) overall (CAI overall) and (2) while under the influence of methamphetamine (CAI with methamphetamine). At the immediate postintervention assessment, the interaction term between CSA and intervention arm was not statistically significant for either outcome, indicating no moderation effect. However, at the 3-month postintervention assessment, the interaction term was significant for both outcomes. At this time point, for those without CSA, there was a significantly lower number of CAI acts in the intervention condition vs the comparison condition for both outcomes. For those with CSA, however, there was no significant difference between the intervention and comparison conditions for CAI overall, although for the outcome CAI with methamphetamine, the intervention condition had higher levels. Future HIV prevention interventions among MSM with methamphetamine use disorder should consider screening for CSA and addressing CSA-related psychological distress, which may potentially preserve intervention effects.