Sign in
Clinician judgment vs formal scales for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes
Journal article   Open access  Peer reviewed

Clinician judgment vs formal scales for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes

David Y Hwang, Cameron A Dell, Mary J Sparks, Tiffany D Watson, Carl D Langefeld, Mary E Comeau, Jonathan Rosand, Thomas W K Battey, Sebastian Koch, Mario L Perez, …
Neurology, Vol.86(2), pp.126-133
2016-01-12
PMCID: PMC4731687
PMID: 26674335

Abstract

Severity of Illness Index Predictive Value of Tests Risk Assessment - methods Prognosis Prospective Studies Humans Middle Aged Male Cerebral Hemorrhage - physiopathology Cerebral Hemorrhage - diagnosis Cerebral Hemorrhage - blood Young Adult Adolescent Aged, 80 and over Recovery of Function - physiology Adult Cerebral Hemorrhage - therapy Female Aged Judgment - physiology Physician's Role
url
https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002266View
Published (Version of record) Open

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.105 Strokes
1.105.142 Stroke
Web Of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
ESI research areas
Neuroscience & Behavior

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Details