Sign in
Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions
Journal article   Open access

Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions

Christopher R. Good, Lindsay Orosz, Samuel R. Schroerlucke, Andrew Cannestra, Jae Y. Lim, Victor W. Hsu, Faissal Zahrawi, Hunaldo J. Villalobos, Pedro M. Ramirez, Thomas Sweeney, …
Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), Vol.46(23), pp.1661-1668
2021-12-01
PMID: 33826591

Abstract

Clinical Neurology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Neurosciences & Neurology Orthopedics Science & Technology
url
https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004048View
Published (Version of record) Open

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.129 Back pain
1.129.175 Intervertebral Disc
Web Of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
Orthopedics
ESI research areas
Neuroscience & Behavior

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Details