Abstract
The distinction between lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor can be challenging in some cases. While detection of MDM2 gene amplification via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been well established as a diagnostic tool to distinguish atypical lipomatous tumor and well-differentiated liposarcoma from benign mimics, MDM2 RNA in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) has recently been proposed as an alternative diagnostic assay. During clinical workup for lipomatous tumors using MDM2 RNA-ISH, we noticed several dysplastic lipomas that were positive for MDM2 RNA-ISH but negative for MDM2 amplification by FISH. In this study, we examined a series of 11 dysplastic lipomas, all confirmed to be negative for MDM2 amplification by FISH. Positive MDM2 RNA-ISH was noted in 10 (91%) dysplastic lipomas. Single-nucleotide polymorphism array on one dysplastic lipoma identified the presence of homozygous deletion of 13q, including the RB1 gene locus with no evidence of MDM2 copy number gain. Our findings on the discordance between MDM2 FISH and MDM2 RNA-ISH highlight the potential utility and pitfalls of using MDM2 RNA-ISH in the distinction of atypical lipomatous tumor and related liposarcomas from dysplastic lipoma.
•Dysplastic lipoma shows prominent variation in adipocyte size and single-cell necrosis, mimicking atypical lipomatous tumor.•Although dysplastic lipoma is negative for MDM2 gene amplification by MDM2 FISH, >90% of cases are positive for MDM2 RNA-ISH.•Discordance between MDM2 FISH and MDM2 RNA-ISH has implications on the use of MDM2 RNA-ISH in assessing lipomatous tumors.
