Abstract
There is a lack of pooled data exploring the time and rates for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) monotherapy
combination therapies (hCG+human menopausal gonadotropin or recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone) to restore spermatogenesis in azoospermic men with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH). We aimed to investigate the time and rates to recover spermatogenesis among azoospermic CHH men receiving monotherapy
combination therapy.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines. The search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to November 2023. Forrest plots were generated to visually present the pooled effect sizes for time to recover spermatogenesis, specifically employing the standardized mean difference (SMD). Publication bias was assessed utilizing funnel plots. PROSPERO ID: CRD42023473615.
The search identified 720 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis of 1,240 men with CHH revealed significant differences in the time to recover spermatogenesis between combination therapies and monotherapy. The weighted mean recovery time was significantly shorter for combination therapies (10 months) compared to monotherapy (33 months). The SMD under the common effect model was 8.8 for combination therapies and 24.98 for monotherapy, indicating a more rapid recovery with combination therapies, p<0.01. The rates of sperm recovery were 66.76% for combination therapies and 51.9% for monotherapy, p=0.03. Significant heterogeneity was observed in both groups (I²=86% for combination therapies and I²=68% for monotherapy), suggesting considerable variation in individual responses.
The present meta-analysis reveals that in men with CHH, combination therapies expedite spermatogenesis recovery more than monotherapy. Additionally, combination therapies yield a higher rate of sperm appearing in the ejaculate as compared to hCG monotherapy. The significant heterogeneity observed in both groups underscores the variability in individual responses, warranting further investigation and caution in interpreting these results.