- Title
- Evaluating the relationship between citation set size, team size and screening methods used in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study
- Creators
- Katie O’Hearn - Ottawa, ON CanadaCameron MacDonald - Hamilton, ON CanadaAnne Tsampalieros - Ottawa, ON CanadaLeo Kadota - Ottawa, ON CanadaRyan Sandarage - Vancouver, BC CanadaSupun Kotteduwa Jayawarden - Vancouver, BC CanadaMichele Datko - Plymouth Meeting, PA USAJohn M Reynolds - University of Miami, Calder Medical LibraryThanh Bui - Toronto, ON CanadaShagufta Sultan - Ottawa, ON CanadaMargaret Sampson - Ottawa, ON CanadaMisty Pratt - Ottawa, ON CanadaNick Barrowman - Ottawa, ON CanadaNassr Nama - Vancouver, BC CanadaMatthew Page - Melbourne, AustraliaJames Dayre McNally - Ottawa, ON Canada
- Publication Details
- BMC medical research methodology, Vol.21(1), pp.142-142
- Publisher
- BioMed Central
- Academic Unit
- Calder Medical Library; Miller School of Medicine
- Language
- English
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Record Identifier
- 991031612758802976
Journal article
Evaluating the relationship between citation set size, team size and screening methods used in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study
BMC medical research methodology, Vol.21(1), pp.142-142
2021-12-01
Metrics
25 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Citation topics
- 1 Clinical & Life Sciences
- 1.155 Medical Ethics
- 1.155.611 Evidence Based Medicine
- Web Of Science research areas
- Health Care Sciences & Services
- ESI research areas
- Clinical Medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites