Abstract
Native forest species exhibit a well‐known range of ecological roles with respect to natural disturbance regimes, from pioneer phase to mature phase, and they regenerate from a range of sources, including dormant seeds, seed rain, pre‐established juveniles, and resprouts from damaged adults. In contrast, the ecological roles of invasive, non‐indigenous species in forest communities after natural disturbances are not well understood. Some previous studies of invasive species have emphasized their weedy nature and their ability to colonize anthropogenic disturbances. Tropical hardwood hammock forests in southern Florida experience frequent disturbance by hurricanes. Our studies of forest regeneration during two years following a recent severe hurricane suggest that invasive non‐indigenous forest species exhibit the same range of ecological roles as native forest species and compete with native species for particular kinds of regeneration opportunities.
To study ecological roles of non‐indigenous species in regenerating forests after Hurricane Andrew, we set up four large study areas at each of three study sites that had differing amounts of hurricane‐caused canopy disturbance. There were two pairs of 30 × 60 m research plots per site, and in each pair there was one control plot and one restoration plot; restoration areas were subject to an aggressive management program, focused on reducing non‐indigenous vine cover. Within these study areas we subsampled vegetation in small study plots that were regularly spaced, and conducted vegetation censuses in April (the end of the dry season) and October (the end of the rainy season) for 2 yr, beginning in April 1993.
We found that the source of regeneration for forest species was dependent upon the amount of canopy disturbance, the time since disturbance, and the autecology of the constituent species. Overall, 28% of the 90 species were non‐indigenous: 34% of the vines (N = 32) and 24% of other life‐forms (N = 58). Non‐indigenous vines seemed to have a special role; not only could they compete with native vines, but they could also negatively affect the regeneration of other natives from a diverse array of sources including pre‐established juveniles and resprouts from damaged adults. Both native and non‐indigenous vine cover in unmanipulated study areas increased following the hurricane. Non‐indigenous vine species had higher cover than native vine species, and many species formed dense “blankets.” Non‐indigenous species in general (not just vines) did not differ significantly from native species in seed mass, nor were they restricted to the pioneer type of life history. Many non‐indigenous species had invaded forests prior to hurricane disturbance and had their own banks of pre‐established juveniles; others recruited from dormant seeds, seed rain, and/or resprouts from pre‐established adults.
Based on information on source of regeneration and impact on native species, we propose a classification scheme for functional roles of non‐indigenous invasive species in forests. To investigate whether non‐indigenous taxa had roles in other geographic regions similar to those they had in Florida, we reviewed literature for 50 taxa belonging to genera that have species known to be invasive in southern Florida. We found that these taxa were invasive or had congeners that were invasive in other geographic regions (Western Australia, the Mariana Islands, Hawaii, the Mascarene Islands, and South Africa). We propose that taxa predominantly retain their invasive, functional‐role type across regions. Thus, studies of ecological roles of invasive species with respect to natural disturbance regimes in one region may help us predict invasive roles in other regions.
