Abstract
AIM: The aim is to evaluate which of the existing scoring systems of histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy best stratifies the clinical outcome of patients with localized Ewing sarcoma of bone. METHODS: 474 patients with diagnosis of localized Ewing sarcoma of bone were included. The median follow-up was 13.5 years. RESULTS: The overall survival and the disease-free survival (DFS) were 70.8% and 63.9% at 5 years. The percentage of histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy ranged between 5% and 100% (mean 83%). The agreement between Bologna System and the different percentual cut-offs of histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was high, with kappa statistics of 0.83 for a cut-off of ≥90%; 0.86 for a cut-off of ≥95%; 0.79 for a cut-off of ≥96% and 0.61 for a cut-off of 100%. Statistically higher DFS rates for good responders compared to poor responders were found when using each given system. Model performance indicators showed that Bologna system had a lower AIC score and a higher c-statistics to predict DFS. When the patients classified as good responders using the different percentual cut-offs of histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were instead re-classified using the Bologna system, statistical differences were noted in DFS within each specific group. CONCLUSIONS: All scoring tools to evaluate histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy offer good predictive value for DFS in localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone. The Bologna system better stratifies those patients with histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 90 and 99%, representing a more reliable scoring tool in this subset.