Abstract
It can be difficult to determine whether a prohibition to exploitation ensures effective conservation or recovery for species that remain exposed to fishing effort and other sources of mortality throughout their range. Here we used simulation modeling of four life history scenarios (different productivity and population size) to contextualize potential population response to multiple levels of mortality, using white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in South Africa as a case study. The species has been protected since 1991, yet substantial uncertainty about population dynamics persists and recent declines at two aggregation sites have renewed conservation concern. All scenarios indicated that annual removals in the 10s of individuals would substantially limit the potential for and magnitude of any abundance increase following prohibition. Because average known removals from the KwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board’s Bather Protection Program have typically remained higher than these thresholds, they likely eliminated much of the conservation benefit derived from prohibition. The only life history scenario to achieve appreciable increase when simulated removals were similar to published averages assumed maturation occurred at a much younger age than currently understood. Our results demonstrate why general application of life history-based simulations can provide a useful mechanism to evaluate the biological plausibility of life history information and abundance trends, and to explore the scope for population response to recovery actions. For South Africa, our results suggest that even known levels of white shark removals, which likely underestimate total removals within their range, may be sufficient to drive abundance decline and new mitigation measures may be required to ensure population recovery.
