Abstract
Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) are recurrent in several malignancies and prevalent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Olutasidenib and ivosidenib are inhibitors that target mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) and are FDA approved for the treatment of patients with mIDH1 AML. Olutasidenib and ivosidenib were identified through unique molecular screens and thus are structurally very different molecules. A difference in clinical outcomes has been observed with olutasidenib, which has a longer duration of response than ivosidenib, despite similar rates of response being achieved with the two drugs, such as complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh). In the absence of a head-to-head trial, this review examines both the extent of differences in clinical outcomes with the two drugs and provides the first comparison of the unique molecular and mechanistic features of each drug, such as molecular structure and binding kinetics, that may contribute to the observed clinical difference in outcomes. Olutasidenib is structurally smaller with a lower molecular weight than ivosidenib (FW 355 vs FW 583) and thus occupies less space in the binding pocket of IDH1 dimers, making it resistant to displacement by IDH1 second-site mutations. In biochemical studies, olutasidenib selectively inhibits mutant but not wild-type IDH1, whereas ivosidenib appears to potently block both mutant and wild-type IDH1. Although they have the same target, olutasidenib and ivosidenib have unique molecular features, which may translate to selectivity differences in their inhibitory activity against IDH1.