Logo image
Occupational distress and sleep crisis: Reframing recovery as organizational responsibility
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Occupational distress and sleep crisis: Reframing recovery as organizational responsibility

Kenneth O Anujuo, Girardin Jean-Louis and Ikenna D Ebuenyi
Work (Reading, Mass.), p.10519815261433952
2026-05-12
PMID: 42117640

Abstract

organizational design and management sleep system-level occupational distress intervention integrated strategy
Background: Occupational distress is currently an underappreciated epidemic in modern work environments, which erodes both productivity and well-being in the general population. Growing evidence suggests that chronic job-related stress disrupts sleep architecture, accelerates cardiometabolic and neurocognitive decline and perpetuates a cycle of diminished resilience. Objective: In this commentary, the authors call for an integrated framework that places sleep as a core dimension of occupational health policy, rather than a mere individual lifestyle choice. Methods: An extensive literature review was conducted to search for relevant articles using relevant keywords. Articles matching the subject and relevant to occupational distress and sleep crisis were extracted, studied in detail, and included in the commentary. Result: We found existing gaps in the literature on occupational distress and sleep crisis, emphasizing the need for wider discussion and generous debate on this subject. Most organizations recommend individual-level stress and sleep management to address occupational distress and sleep crisis in workplaces rather than advocating for organizational reforms. Conclusion: As organizations increasingly acknowledge employee wellbeing as a strategic priority, there is an urgent need to reconceptualize recovery and sleep not as personal lifestyle choices but as outcomes shaped by organizational structures, cultures, and policies. By reframing recovery as a shared responsibility, this commentary contributes to ongoing debates about sustainable work, health-protective organizational design, and the ethical obligations of employers in safeguarding employee wellbeing and also seeks to propel both academic inquiry and organizational practice towards structural change rather than mere adaptation.
url
https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261433952View
Published (Version of record) Open

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image