Logo image
Peer Mentoring Improves Diabetes Technology Use and Reduces Diabetes Distress Among Underserved Communities: Outcomes of a Pilot Diabetes Support Coach Intervention
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Peer Mentoring Improves Diabetes Technology Use and Reduces Diabetes Distress Among Underserved Communities: Outcomes of a Pilot Diabetes Support Coach Intervention

Jennifer Maizel, Michael Haller, David M Maahs, ANANTA Addala, Stephanie L. Filipp, Rayhan A. Lal, Matthew Gurka, Lauren Figg, Melanie Hechavarria, Dessi P. Zaharieva, …
Journal of diabetes research, Vol.2025(1), p.1970247
2025
PMID: 40678170

Abstract

health coaching health equity peer support social support Diabetes
Background: There are well-documented disparities in diabetes care outcomes and technology usage, stemming from differences in healthcare access, distrust in healthcare providers, and other factors. This study evaluated patient-level outcomes of a diabetes support coach (DSC) intervention aimed at improving underserved adults’ diabetes technology use, diabetes distress, and HbA1c levels. Methods: As part of a Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Diabetes program, a social support intervention involving 28 DSCs was piloted at 33 Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in Florida and California from May 2021 to May 2022. DSCs, who were adults with diabetes, served in a capacity similar to peer mentors and community health workers and received uniform training/oversight by a clinical team. Intervention participants (n = 74 adults with insulin-requiring diabetes at FQHCs) self-enrolled and engaged with DSCs via text messages, phone calls, and events. Participants’ outcomes were evaluated cross-sectionally via the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS-17) and a diabetes technology usage survey and longitudinally via HbA1c tests upon enrollment and at 6-month follow-up. A group of adults with insulin-requiring diabetes from the same FQHCs who did not receive the DSC intervention (n = 363) was used for comparison. Descriptive statistics were computed for all outcomes (n, percentage; mean, SD/95% CI). Between-group comparisons were evaluated via chi-squared and t-tests. Results: DSC intervention participants reported significantly lower diabetes distress than the comparison group (DDS-17 score mean = 1.6 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001), and significantly more participants in the DSC intervention regularly used continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) than the comparison group (69.9% vs. 38.8%, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in insulin pump usage or HbA1c. Conclusions: Lower diabetes distress and greater CGM usage among intervention participants suggest that the DSCs’ shared lived experiences and healthcare navigation support positively influenced underserved adults’ outcomes. These findings show DSCs’ potential for improving diabetes care and technology equity.
url
https://doi.org/10.1155/jdr/1970247View
Published (Version of record)

Metrics

1 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
1 Clinical & Life Sciences
1.26 Diabetes
1.26.42 Diabetes Management
Web Of Science research areas
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Medicine, Research & Experimental
ESI research areas
Clinical Medicine

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Details

Logo image