Logo image
Tandem reef restoration using corals and sea urchins: Building complex habitat for herbivores
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Tandem reef restoration using corals and sea urchins: Building complex habitat for herbivores

Catherine Lachnit, Emily Esplandiu, Joshua Patterson and Diego Lirman
PloS one, Vol.20(6), p.e0325468
2025-06-10
Appears in  Rosenstiel School - Latest Publications

Abstract

Biology and Life Sciences Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Engineering and Technology Physical Sciences Social Sciences
Amidst the decline of coral reef ecosystems, restoration practitioners are expanding their focus to incorporate key reef community components, such as grazers, to improve site conditions and the long-term survivorship of restored corals. We investigated the use of hatchery-propagated Diadema antillarum as well as two other locally abundant urchin species, Lytechinus variegatus and Echinometra viridis , for coral-urchin tandem reef restoration in Florida, USA. Urchins were deployed onto reef plots at various stages of Acropora cervicornis restoration and provided artificial cement refuges to evaluate retention and herbivory rates. Retention of urchins was low and variable among species. After 42 days, retention was 22% for E. viridis , 7% for D. antillarum , and 0% for L. variegatus . Retention was influenced by plot complexity (restoration state) and was significantly higher in high-complexity plots for D. antillarum and E. viridis . Within plots, refuge types did not have a significant influence on urchin retention. A reduction in macroalgal cover was only observed on plots with relocated E. viridis when densities were maintained > 0.4 urchins m -2 . A second deployment of D. antillarum, with urchins caged for a month prior to release, resulted in significantly higher urchin retention. Within cages, grazing and the consumption of coral tissue were influenced by urchin density. At low urchin densities (4 urchins m -2 ) macroalgae cover remained high and corals were overgrown by algae. At intermediate densities (12 urchins m -2 ) algae were reduced and the growth of corals was maximized. At the highest densities (40 urchins m -2 ), algal cover was reduced but urchins caused tissue mortality as a result of over-grazing, highlighting the importance of maintaining relocated urchins at adequate densities to maximize the benefits of tandem restoration. Thus, if retention can be improved and urchins maintained at intermediate densities, the tandem restoration of corals and sea urchins could increase the efficacy of reef restoration.
pdf
Tandem reef restoration using corals and sea urchins: Building complex habitat for herbivores1.61 MBDownloadView
Open Access

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Citation topics
3 Agriculture, Environment & Ecology
3.2 Marine Biology
3.2.570 Coral Reef Ecology
Web Of Science research areas
Marine & Freshwater Biology
ESI research areas
Plant & Animal Science

Details

Logo image