Abstract
To compare the outcomes of standard pop-titrated transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCPC) and slow-coagulation TSCPC in the treatment of glaucoma.
Retrospective case series.
This study included 78 eyes with glaucoma of any type or stage that underwent TSCPC as part of their treatment course.
This study compared 52 eyes treated with slow coagulation TSCPC to 26 eyes treated with standard pop-titrated TSCPC. Patient demographics, treatment course, surgical techniques, settings and outcomes were assessed.
The main outcome measures were visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and post-surgical complications.
The initial LogMAR VA was 1.94 (0.73) [mean (SD)] in the slow coagulation TSCPC group and 1.71 (0.90) in the standard TSCPC group (p=0.507). Initial IOP was 37 (13) mm Hg in the slow coagulation group and 39 (13) mm Hg in the standard group (p=0.297). The follow-up periods were 16.36 months and 24.68 months for the slow coagulation and standard groups (p=0.124). VA remained better than light-perception in 71.1% of slow coagulation treated patients and 65.0% of standard TSCPC treated patients (p=0.599). IOP remained below 20 mm Hg in 46% of slow coagulation treated patients and 44% of standard TSCPC treated patients (p=0.870). The mean number of complications was higher in the standard group [1.46 (1.24)] versus the slow coagulation group [0.62 (0.75)] (p=0.002). The incidence of the need for a second procedure (slow coagulation- 28.8%, standard- 23.1%, p=0.588) and maximum number of medications needed to control IOP postoperatively (p=0.771) were similar between the two groups.
In this case series, slow coagulation TSCPC and standard pop-titrated TSCPC resulted in similar VA and IOP outcomes in the treatment of glaucomatous eyes. The complication profiles of the techniques were also comparable, although standard TSCPC had a higher incidence of prolonged inflammation postoperatively. This study suggests that slow coagulation TSCPC may achieve equivalent control of IOP while reducing the incidence of prolonged post-operative inflammation-a feared complication of TSCPC-when compared to standard "pop-titrated" TSCPC.
