Why Have Recent Trials of Neuroprotective Agents in Head Injury Failed to Show Convincing Efficacy? A Pragmatic Analysis and Theoretical Considerations

Journal article

Peer reviewed

Andrew I.R Maas, Ewout W Steyerberg, Gordon D Murray, Ross Bullock, Alexander Baethmann, Lawrence F Marshall and Graham M Teasdale

Neurosurgery, Vol.44(6), pp.1286-1298

1999-06

Metrics

13 Record Views

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration; International collaboration
Citation topics: 1 Clinical & Life Sciences; 1.134 Trauma & Emergency Surgery; 1.134.286 Traumatic Brain Injury
Web Of Science research areas: Clinical Neurology; Surgery
ESI research areas: Clinical Medicine

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

Source: InCites

Title: Why Have Recent Trials of Neuroprotective Agents in Head Injury Failed to Show Convincing Efficacy? A Pragmatic Analysis and Theoretical Considerations
Creators: Andrew I.R Maas
Ewout W Steyerberg
Gordon D Murray
Ross Bullock
Alexander Baethmann
Lawrence F Marshall
Graham M Teasdale
Publication Details: Neurosurgery, Vol.44(6), pp.1286-1298
Academic Unit: UMMG Dept of Neurological Surgery
Language: English
Resource Type: Journal article
Record Identifier: 991031598070602976