Germane Barnes

One of architecture's most enduring clichés of self-definition concerns the distinction between "architecture" and "mere building"-the notion that the architect's ambitions largely transcend those of a community's basic needs. In a world where a comfortable roof over one's head is out of reach for so many, it's perhaps unsurprising, then, that architecture is often viewed by the public as an unobtainable and unnecessary luxury. Germane Barnes, by contrast, argues that architecture is indispensable-especially in under-resourced communities. Here, Barnes describes his experience working as designer-in-residence for a nonprofit community development corporation. Barnes shares his belief that the joy and dignity good design can bring are essential to one's very well-being.

Racist ideologies are embedded in spaces we design. From courtrooms to classrooms, and from circulation to threshold, architects in the US design spaces that reflect an institutionalization of white supremacy. While the whiteness of such spaces may be invisible to some, it is oppressive and even violent for others. This paper contributes a framework for describing and analyzing white space in architecture. We build on sociological theories of white institutions to demonstrate how architectural elements express and perpetuate institutional racism. We illustrate this framework through reviewing sociological interpretations of institutional spaces. Such elements as seating arrangements in classrooms and spatial hierarchy in courtrooms not only harbor a white institutional history, but they engender a racialized experience of space. We argue that reading architecture through the proposed lens of white institutional space is an important step toward confronting institutional racism inherent in design and space.

Architecture education routinely manifests deity-like figures. They are placed on pedestals and their work, whether theoretical or actualized, acquires a holistic reverence. Rem Koolhaas, Jane Jacobs, etc. are architectural prophets that influence history, theory and practice. Explicitly or implicitly, their texts show clear bigotry and privilege. Jacobs states, “In some city areas-older public housing projects and streets with very high population turnover are often conspicuous examples—the keeping of public sidewalk law and order is left almost entirely to the police and special guards. Such places are jungles”.