Jacob Nicholas Batycki

Introduction Stopping an infectious disease outbreak relies on a coordinated set of actions across public and private institutions and the wider public. However, cooperation with public health recommendations was notably hindered during the pandemic by widespread distrust in science and government and the notion that public health competed with other priorities. This study aims to examine the factors driving distrust and competing priorities in Florida, and potential pathways to overcome these issues.Methods We conducted an additional analyses of qualitative data from our original study involving 25 semi-structured interviews with Florida stakeholders from government, academia, and the private sector. We employed a deductive-inductive approach to qualitative content analysis, using themes from the initial study as a guiding framework while allowing for the emergence of additional insights.Results Interviews revealed that inadequate transparency and data availability, politicization, and poor communication were perceived as undermining public trust in science and decision-makers during COVID-19. The economy and individual rights were discussed as priorities competing against public health during the pandemic. Objectives for building trust and balancing priorities included five essential areas: transparency, representation, communication, education, and balance.Discussion These challenges and objectives reflect the need for a reimagined approach to public health policy and practice-one that is rooted in trust and respect for diverse value systems. By leveraging core collective values that cut across political ideologies, we may mitigate polarization and perceived stigmatization to build a more culturally resonant public health practice.

As shown by COVID-19, infectious diseases with a pandemic potential present a grave threat to health and wellbeing. Although the International Health Regulations provide a framework of binding legal obligations for pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, many countries do not comply with these regulations. There is a need for a renewed framework for global collective action that ensures conformity with international regulations and promotes effective prevention and response to pandemic infectious diseases. This Health Policy identifies the necessary characteristics for a new global public health security convention designed to optimise prevention, preparedness, and response to pandemic infectious diseases. We propose ten recommendations to strengthen global public health governance and promote compliance with global health security regulations. Recommendations for a new global public health security convention include greater authority for a global governing body, an improved ability to respond to pandemics, an objective evaluation system for national core public health capacities, more effective enforcement mechanisms, independent and sustainable funding, representativeness, and investment from multiple sectors, among others. The next steps to achieve these recommendations include assembling an invested alliance, specifying the operational structures of a global public health security system, and overcoming barriers such as insufficient political will, scarcity of resources, and individual national interests.